How Babe Ruth’s trade was reported

It may be premature, but it could be said that the last vestige of the “Curse of the Bambino” is about to fall, as the Boston Red Sox have a chance to win the World Series in Fenway for the first time since 1918. To be more exact, they have have a chance to be the first Boston team to clinch the title at home since this game. In 1918, due to WWI restrictions, the 1918 season was shorter and the World Series happened in September.

Take a look at that game. And notice how different it was: it took only 1:56 to play, it was a day game and only 15,238 were in attendance. Hall of Famers Harry Hooper and Babe Ruth (who was used as a defensive replacement, despite still being primarily a pitcher at the time) were on Boston, and HOF umpires Bill Klem and Hank O’Day were working the corner bases (there were only four umpires in the playoffs back then).

Of course, that ended up being the last World Series game that Ruth would play for the Red Sox, because on December 26 of the following year, he was infamously sold to the New York Yankees. And that’s what brings us to this article, where I take a look at how the Ruth sale was reported in the papers of 1919.. or, rather, 1920, since it took TEN DAYS for them to officially announce it.

(JUMP)

It was not a secret that Ruth and the Red Sox were having a contract dispute- going through papers in the weeks leading up to the announcement of the deal, you can find various things about it, and on the day the deal was announced (but before it got out), the Evening World in New York had at least three comments/scuttlebutts/rumors on Ruth’s contract demands in it’s “Live Wires” section. But, still, it’s unlikely anybody thought that he’d get traded, and the New York media was positively giddy when it happened.

The Evening World, for example, had this big comic (click it to expand):

Screen Shot 2013-10-30 at 1.32.30 PMWhat’s less well-known today is that there were still worries about Ruth’s contract and whether he’s sign. Right next to that cartoon, for example, was a headline saying Ruth was saying he didn’t want to play anywhere but Boston. Obviously, such a comment ended up never amounting to anything.

Anyway, most immediately recognized the significance of Ruth’s move to New York:

  • That cartoon in the Evening World shows, amongst other things, a Yankee fan dreaming of a World title (after all, they’d never won one!) and two fans wanting to kiss each other they are so overjoyed. “The biggest thing in the history of local baseball,” said a column on that same page. The Evening Post, also in New York City, declared that the deal instantly launched the Yankees from an “anemic aggregation” of previous years to a club that everyone from “Ban Johnson to the peanut vendor in the stands” would predict to win the title. The Post also said that time would eventually heal the wound the Boston fans had felt… which it did… eventually.
  • Frederick J. Lieb of The Sun in New York ended his first paragraph on the Ruth deal with, “And don’t be afraid to pinch yourself either, Mr. New York Fan, because it’s gospel truth.”
  • Louis A. Dougher of The Washington Times (no relation to the current newspaper of the same name) instantly recognized how much playing in the Polo Grounds would favor Ruth, while also noting this:

“New York is a city of hero worshipers. No other city in the country so loves to coddle to itself an athletic hero. Ruth is destined from the beginning to make the Yankees quite as great favorites with the New York fans as ever the Giants were, and the Giants ‘belong’ in the metropolis.”

  • Of course, Boston fans were… well, as the Washington Times put it:
  • Screen Shot 2013-10-30 at 1.58.52 PMMany papers also liked noting how far Ruth had come. The Washington Times and New York’s The Sun both mentioned how he had just six years before been a inmate at a reformatory in Baltimore.
  • Red Sox management spun it like this (from The Sun):
  • Screen Shot 2013-10-30 at 2.09.13 PMThe Utica (NY) Post-Dispatch found a different angle: that Frank Baker (AKA “Home Run Baker“) would be playing with Babe Ruth, making the old home run hitter stand alongside the new home run hitter.
  • While I couldn’t find anything for free online that should how Boston’s papers reacted, a New York Times article from the time mentioned that they had cartoons up of various other things in Boston that could be for sale, including the library, Boston Commons, and Fenway Park itself, but that the Boston Herald had urged fans not to rush to judgment.

Of course, it turned out that, if anything, not rushing to judgment was probably the worst possible move, as Ruth only went on to become, well, Babe Ruth.

2 thoughts on “How Babe Ruth’s trade was reported

  1. Pingback: How Babe Ruth’s trade was reported (Updated!) | The Baseball Continuum

  2. Pingback: Best of 2014- How Babe Ruth’s trade was reported (Updated!) | The Baseball Continuum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s